Increasing Access to Free Tax Preparation in New York City

Photo provided by Citi for Talkpoverty.org
Photo provided by Citi for Talkpoverty.org

Increasing Access to Free Tax Preparation in New York City

When Cynthia went to the free tax preparation site near her house, it was difficult to convince her to take advantage of the services being offered. Cynthia was adamant about using a paid preparer who advertised a $50 bonus. She didn’t trust “free,” and she thought the paid preparer would provide better service. But a couple of days later Cynthia came back to the free tax prep site. She was angry. It turned out the $50 bonus that the paid preparer had advertised came with $600 in fees. Now she’s an advocate for the City’s free tax preparation services, and has referred friends and family members as well.

In her words, “A bonus can cost you!”

According to Internal Revenue Service (IRS) data, New Yorkers claimed the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) for a cumulative $2.5 billion in refunds. The EITC—one of the greatest tools we have for fighting poverty—gives families and individual tax filers with low- or moderate-incomes sizeable refunds, depending on income level and number of dependents. Research shows that the EITC returns an average of $2,500 to eligible filers in New York City—a significant cash infusion for low-income families. More often than not, a tax refund check is the largest single check these families receive all year. In New York City, most EITC-eligible people are also eligible for free tax preparation through the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) network, but fewer than 5 percent take advantage of it. Where are the other 95 percent? And why would anyone opt to spend hundreds of dollars for something that is offered for free at nearly 200 VITA sites citywide?

Clearly there needs to be an improved process for tax filing.

The NYC Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) Office of Financial Empowerment has joined forces with Parsons Design for Social Innovation and Sustainability (DESIS) Lab, the Center for Economic Opportunity (CEO), Food Bank For New York City, Citi Community Development, and Mayor’s Fund to Advance New York City—to create a new approach to free tax preparation services in New York City. It’s called Designing for Financial Empowerment.

The initiative is composed of three phases: discovery, during which the research team was embedded in the VITA sites and interviewed community members and stakeholders; co-design, where the research team collaborates with users, service providers, government officials, funders, and others to generate ideas to address VITA challenges; and iterative prototyping, in which one or multiple solutions will be rapidly tested at the VITA sites and revised based on user responses.

Read the full blog post on talkpoverty.org here.

Ana Nieto at El Diario writes on debt collection agency case

Image courtesy of El Diario article.
Image courtesy of El Diario article.

NYC manda un aviso al sector de créditos abusivos
By Ana Nieto | El Diario 

Las primeras cartas ya han siendo enviadas. En los próximos días varios miles de residentes de Nueva York van a recibir una comunicación en la que se les explica que tienen derecho a una compensación por haber sido víctimas de una agencia cobradora de deuda, National Credit Adjusters (NCA), que trataba de recobrar dinero debido a entidades que hacían préstamos abusivos.

Estos créditos, de elevadas tasas de interés, son conocidos como pay day loans y está prohibido hacerlos y cobrarlos en Nueva York y 14 estados más. Aún así muchas firmas los ofrecen a través de Internet. La tasa anual de los préstamos que NCA ha cobrado e intentaba seguir cobrando rondaba el 782%.

El Departamento de Consumidores (DCA en sus siglas en inglés) del Ayuntamiento de Nueva York llegó hace unos días a un acuerdo con este cobrador de deudas para quedevolviera $962,800 a unos 4,663 personas en la ciudad. Desde el ayuntamiento se buscan más víctimas para asegurar que todos cobran lo que se les debe. Según la comisionada del DCA, Julie Menin, “tiene que cobrar este dinero quien sea víctima desde 2007, independientemente de su estatus migratorio que no se contrasta al abonar el dinero”.

Click here to read the full article.

Commissioner Menin Talks Paid Sick Leave on BK Live

NYC DCA Commissioner Julie Menin discusses the new paid sick leave law in New York City and other DCA initiative on BK Live with Brian Vines.

NYT on the Jerry Delakas Case

On a Changing East Village Street, a Source of Continuity Fights for His Job
By Colin Moynihan | New York Times 

[Jerry Delakas] ran the stand for 26 years without ever obtaining the required license, and in December the city closed the cramped, cluttered stand.

Mr Delakas began running the newsstand in 1987, paying weekly fees of $75 and up to the license holders, first Stella Schwartz and later her sister, Katherine Ashley. Although Mr. Delakas said that he saw nothing wrong with the arrangement and never tried to hide it, officials at the Department of Consumer Affairs said it violated the city administrative code, which states that newsstands may be operated only by those with licenses and that licenses are not transferable without approval. When Ms. Ashley died in 2006, her will bequeathed the newsstand license to Mr. Delakas, but rules at the time allowed transfers only to family members, officials said. So the department instead turned the license over to Ms. Ashley’s husband, Sheldon Ashley, who allowed Mr. Delakas to continue running the newsstand.

After Mr. Ashley died in 2010, Mr. Delakas applied for a license to run the stand. City officials declined his request and a judge upheld their decision, noting that Mr. Delakas had engaged in a ‘fraudulent arrangement’ with the Ashleys. In December, the city padlocked the stand, saying it had been operating illegally.

“Four separate courts have rejected Mr. Delaka’s claim that he is entitled to this newsstand,’ Katyusca Abreu, a spokeswoman for the Department of Consumer Affairs, wrote in an email, adding that the agency “will now be able to offer the newsstand to licensed operators who have been displaced” from other areas.

Click here to read the full article.

SI Advance on Gender-Pricing

Laundering shirts? Staten Island women will pay more
Malena Carollo | Staten Island Advance

In an informal survey the Advance conducted of 30 laundry and dry cleaning shops in the borough, 19 charged more to launder and press a woman’s Oxford button-down shirt than for the same man’s Oxford.

Pricing based on gender is more than just frustrating at the register — it’s illegal.

Chapter Five of Title 20 in the New York City administrative code outlaws different pricing per gender and requires all prices be posted.

The Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) enforces fair pricing.

“The most basic consumer right is one and the same with the most basic civil right: you cannot be treated differently based upon who you are,” DCA spokesperson Katyusca Abreu said in an email.

“That’s why Consumer Affairs is so vigilant about ensuring that all prices are posted,” Ms. Abreu said via email, “so people are all charged the same thing, and that those prices not be based upon a person’s gender.”

Click here to read the full article.

NYDN on Small Business Fines

Business owners on Intervale Ave. in the Bronx complain of petty ticket blitz
Some say the summonses target Latino and black shopkeepers who don’t have the money or strength to fight. City says fines are for trash. 
Tanay Warerkar | New York Daily News

Store owners in the poor and majority minority neighborhood allege they are being targeted unfairly in a money-making scheme by city agencies because they don’t have the means to defend themselves.

A Department of Consumer Affairs spokeswoman denied the city was unfairly targeting the neighborhood.

“There is no truth to this at all,” said agency spokeswoman Katyusca Abreu. “Every retail business in the Bronx, and throughout the city, is subject to the same legal protections (the department) enforces to protect New York consumers.”

Click here to read the full article.